Here’s the English version of the generated content on controlling the dosage of white masterbatch in film blowing processes:
How to Control the Addition of White Masterbatch in Film Blowing: Is More Always Better?
The addition of white masterbatch in film blowing directly affects film quality, cost, and performance. **Excessive addition is not advisable**; instead, scientific adjustments must be made based on process requirements, product specifications, and cost considerations. Below is a detailed analysis covering technical principles, control methods, and case studies.
I. Key Influencing Factors for White Masterbatch Dosage
1. Dispersion and Processability
Poor dispersion of masterbatch leads to uneven color distribution and surface roughness. Overloading can cause particle aggregation, resulting in speckles.
Case: A manufacturer reduced masterbatch dosage from **35% to 25%** by using high-mesh (800+ mesh) calcium carbonate and optimizing dispersant ratios, achieving smoother film surfaces.
2. Product Performance Requirements
Adjust dosage based on film thickness, opacity, and mechanical properties. For example, ultra-thin films require higher opacity, but excessive titanium dioxide (TiO₂) may reduce tensile strength or cause yellowing.
Case: A client using a 60% TiO₂ masterbatch experienced film yellowing after one month due to insufficient antioxidants. Switching to rutile-type TiO₂ and adjusting antioxidants resolved the issue at a 50% dosage.
3. Cost-Efficiency Balance
High filler content lowers costs but complicates processing. For instance, inorganic fillers exceeding 70% are challenging to process without advanced modification (e.g., talc surface coating).
II. Methods for Controlling Dosage
1. Optimal Ratio Determination
Conduct gradient tests to identify the minimum effective dosage. For example, achieving **90% opacity** typically requires **20–30% TiO₂** in masterbatch.
2. Dispersion Optimization
Pre-mixing and high-shear processing: Pre-blend masterbatch with carrier resin, then use internal mixers to enhance dispersion. This enables high filler loads (e.g., **75% talc**).
Dispersant additives: Stearamide-based agents reduce particle agglomeration, allowing higher dosages without surface defects.
3. Equipment Adjustments
High-shear screws: Twin-screw extruders outperform single-screw models for high-dosage masterbatches.
Temperature control: Use chilled water cooling in continuous mixing to prevent degradation at high filler levels.
III. Case Studies
1. Case 1: Yellowing Due to Excessive Addition
Issue: A packaging film manufacturer used a 60% TiO₂ masterbatch** (anatase type) with inadequate antioxidants, leading to yellowing.
Solution:
Switched to rutile-type TiO₂(superior UV resistance).
Added a synergistic antioxidant system (e.g., 168+1010).
Reduced dosage to 50% with optimized dispersion.
2. Case 2: High-Filler Masterbatch for Cost Reduction
Solution: A 75% modified talc masterbatch was developed using acid washing (to remove iron impurities), titanate coupling agents, and intensive mixing. This reduced material costs by 30% while maintaining film integrity.
3. Case 3: Low-Cost Filler Optimization
Approach: A PE film producer achieved stable processing with **30% filler masterbatch** by adopting a **two-step pelletization process**, improving dispersion and avoiding line breaks.
IV. Conclusion: The Principle of Balance
White masterbatch dosage must balance:
Upper limit: Determined by dispersion quality, equipment capacity, and material stability (e.g., yellowing or strength loss).
Lower limit: Driven by opacity, color consistency, and functional requirements.
Recommended range: 20–50% for most film-blowing applications, with specific ratios validated through small-scale trials. Blindly increasing dosage risks defects and higher costs, whereas scientific formulation and process optimization ensure optimal results.
Let me know if you need further refinements!
微信扫码 关注我们
24小时咨询热线13561588568
移动电话18769608281